From owner-freebsd-ipfw Fri Jun 21 14: 5:30 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F4E37B412 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2002 14:05:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1098) id 715BFAE303; Fri, 21 Jun 2002 14:05:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 14:05:28 -0700 From: Bill Fumerola To: Luigi Rizzo Cc: ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: do we need IPFIREWALL_FORWARD to be optional ? Message-ID: <20020621210528.GF75238@elvis.mu.org> References: <20020621104900.C81994@iguana.icir.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020621104900.C81994@iguana.icir.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.5-MUORG-20020423 i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 10:49:00AM -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > Unless there are strong objections, I am going to make it > standard. i agree. kldloading ipfw and using fwd requires that you build a kernel with IPFIREWALL_FORWARD, which is rather silly. -- - bill fumerola / fumerola@yahoo-inc.com / billf@FreeBSD.org / billf@mu.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message