From owner-freebsd-mozilla Sat May 23 07:19:57 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA00515 for freebsd-mozilla-outgoing; Sat, 23 May 1998 07:19:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-mozilla@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from elit.elit.chernigov.ua (elit.elit.chernigov.ua [193.125.84.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA00478 for ; Sat, 23 May 1998 07:19:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from al@cn.ua) Received: from cn.ua (al@dragon.cinet.cn.ua [193.125.84.115]) by elit.elit.chernigov.ua (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA04913 for ; Sat, 23 May 1998 17:19:33 +0300 (EET DST) Message-ID: <3566DAF4.4AA87D76@cn.ua> Date: Sat, 23 May 1998 17:19:32 +0300 From: Alexey Lukin Organization: JSC CINET X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.33 i586) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mozilla@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Motif requirement References: <6jt9g3$ejd@elit.elit.chernigov.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-mozilla@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi! Frank W. Miller wrote: > > Just out of curiosity, is there any thought to removing the requirement > for using Motif? It's not just that Motif costs money, I just plain > don't like it. MHO of course. Yeah, I do not like it too. What about qtZilla as base for port? QT library (www.troll.no) is very good and according to KDE (www.kde.org) project will remain in public domain. TrollTech already has working port of Mozilla and QT runs on huge number of platforms. Why not? LessTiff seems to be reliable and stable but it's Motiff clone with traditional drawbacks. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mozilla" in the body of the message