From owner-freebsd-current Mon Mar 20 16:26:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (genesi.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.136.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A30637B943; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 16:26:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (doconnor@cain [203.38.152.97]) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA05206; Tue, 21 Mar 2000 10:56:26 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20000320165818.B4876@spirit.jaded.net> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 10:56:26 +1030 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: Dan Moschuk Subject: Re: emu10k1 (SB Live!) support under FreeBSD? Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, "Thomas T. Veldhouse" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 20-Mar-00 Dan Moschuk wrote: > | How current is this? Will it work against 4.0-STABLE? > I haven't tested it, but I believe so. I applied the patch to a machine which is *just* pre 4/5 split and it patched fine. I used it to get my ALS120 to work. --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message