From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 19 00:17:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9038B16A4CE for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:17:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.ipnet.kiev.ua (ns.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F3C43D41 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:17:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from heffalump.ip.net.ua (heffalump.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.213]) by mail.ipnet.kiev.ua (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i2J8HSU2040110 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:17:28 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by heffalump.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) id i2J8HKQG018777; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:17:20 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru) Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:17:20 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Chuck Swiger Message-ID: <20040319081720.GE18091@ip.net.ua> References: <200403181750.35948.jrh@it.uc3m.es> <4059E686.6050207@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tVmo9FyGdCe4F4YN" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4059E686.6050207@mac.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org cc: Juan Rodriguez Hervella Subject: Re: Small question about bridging and arp X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 08:17:46 -0000 --tVmo9FyGdCe4F4YN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 01:12:22PM -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Juan Rodriguez Hervella wrote: > >If I do a bridge between xl0 and xl1, can the IP address > >configured on xl1 answer ARP-requests that come from the > >LAN the xl0 is connected ? Does this make sense ? >=20 > Yes, it should. Bridging basicly treats xl0 and xl1 as being on the same= =20 > physical network and an ARP request for an IP used by one of the two=20 > interfaces should be answered regardless of where it came from. >=20 One typically also sets net.link.ether.inet.log_arp_wrong_iface=3D0, to avoid annoying kernel messages in such a setup. (See the arp(4) manpage for details.) Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov FreeBSD committer ru@FreeBSD.org --tVmo9FyGdCe4F4YN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAWqyQUkv4P6juNwoRAoKwAJ9ZJ6gtTGCvI0y1glKiWeaad5F8sQCfV8qL AYbSkC3k6XksblR91VdGqCA= =KaEy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tVmo9FyGdCe4F4YN--