From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 23:37:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 874B616A4CE; Wed, 1 Dec 2004 23:37:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2A3B43D55; Wed, 1 Dec 2004 23:37:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior-wifi.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iB1NfR3l063532; Wed, 1 Dec 2004 16:41:27 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <41AE55D7.8020709@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 16:37:59 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040929 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jason C. Wells" References: <41AE3F80.1000506@freebsd.org> <98CE9C0241F1FC59BB8F0547@[192.168.1.16]> In-Reply-To: <98CE9C0241F1FC59BB8F0547@[192.168.1.16]> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pooker.samsco.org cc: hackers@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: My project wish-list for the next 12 months X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 23:37:47 -0000 Jason C. Wells wrote: > --On Wednesday, December 01, 2004 3:02 PM -0700 Scott Long > wrote: > >> 5. Clustered FS support. SANs are all the rage these days, and >> clustered filesystems that allow data to be distributed across many >> storage enpoints and accessed concurrently through the SAN are very >> powerful. RedHat recently bought Sistina and re-opened the GFS source >> code, so exploring this would be very interesting. > > > This sounds very close to OpenAFS. I don't know what distinguishes a > SAN from other types of NAS. OpenAFS does everything you mentioned in > the above paragraph. OpenAFS _almost_ works on FreeBSD right now. > > Later, > Jason C. Wells Well, AFS requires an intelligent node in front of each disk. True SAN clustering means that you have a web of disks directly connected to the SAN (iSCSI, FibreChannel, etc), and two or more servers on the SAN that see those disks as a single filesystem (actually a bit more complicated than this, but you get the point). If one server goes down, no access to data is lost since the disks can be reached from any other server on the SAN that is participating in the clustered FS. Scott