From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 25 12:50:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49AF16A434 for ; Thu, 25 May 2006 12:50:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B0B43D46 for ; Thu, 25 May 2006 12:50:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4PCoIYx047751 for ; Thu, 25 May 2006 12:50:18 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k4PCoHrj047750; Thu, 25 May 2006 12:50:17 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 12:50:17 GMT Message-Id: <200605251250.k4PCoHrj047750@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Matthias Andree Cc: Subject: Re: ports/97839: [patch]news/leafnode+ X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Andree List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 12:50:18 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/97839; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Matthias Andree To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: edwin@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/97839: [patch]news/leafnode+ Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 14:39:46 +0200 On Wed, 24 May 2006, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > Maintainer of news/leafnode, Edwin, I am maintaining news/leafnode, but not news/leafnode+ (which is unmaintained, ports@freebsd.org). The latter is a separate project that forked before I became the leafnode maintainer, and I have no opinion as to what will happen to the news/leafnode+ port, I don't know it enough. Some time ago, Kris Kennaway however recommended to people having issues with leafnode+ to use leafnode (sans +) instead, so perhaps you might want to ask Martin Wilke (the submitter) if he wants to take maintainership. Otherwise, perhaps discuss with portmgr@ if leafnode+ is to be marked deprecated and marked for removal July 31. > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/97839 Kind regards, -- Matthias Andree