From owner-freebsd-questions  Sat May 27 12:20:51 1995
Return-Path: questions-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id MAA00463
          for questions-outgoing; Sat, 27 May 1995 12:20:51 -0700
Received: from crh.cl.msu.edu (crh.cl.msu.edu [35.8.1.24])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id MAA00456
          for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 27 May 1995 12:20:49 -0700
Message-Id: <199505271920.MAA00456@freefall.cdrom.com>
Received: by crh.cl.msu.edu
	(1.38.193.4/16.2) id AA24653; Sat, 27 May 1995 15:20:44 -0400
From: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu>
Subject: PCI Ethernet
To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Date: Sat, 27 May 1995 15:20:44 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 387       
Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Should PCI ethernet adapters use less/more/same amount of system/interupt/user
time that an ISA ethernet adapter would?

And what is interupt clk0 measuring on systat -vm, normally 127/8 but when
doing massive ethernet IO gets into the 1000+ range..

-Crh

    Charles Henrich     Michigan State University     henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu

                     http://rs560.msu.edu/~henrich/