From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Sep 30 21:37:37 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from wantadilla.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.80]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3DC837B40C for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2001 21:37:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wantadilla.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 38E956AB08; Mon, 1 Oct 2001 14:08:15 +0930 (CST) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 14:08:15 +0930 From: Greg Lehey To: Ryan Thompson Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Dual Head with Matrox G450/G550 Message-ID: <20011001140815.Q31215@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20011001112602.E31215@wantadilla.lemis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from ryan@sasknow.com on Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 10:30:43PM -0600 Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 6B 7B C3 8C 61 CD 54 AF 13 24 52 F8 6D A4 95 EF Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sunday, 30 September 2001 at 22:30:43 -0600, Ryan Thompson wrote: > Greg Lehey wrote to Ryan Thompson: > >> On Saturday, 29 September 2001 at 0:31:41 -0600, Ryan Thompson wrote: >>> >>> Hey all, >>> >>> Anyone have any experience running a dual head system with the Matrox G450 >>> or G550 cards in 4.x? (This question comes from someone who has never >>> tried to run a dual head FreeBSD workstation :-) >> >> People have had them running. Check the archive for more details. >> >>> Can anyone comment on general X support for these cards? >> >> It's there, but the second head is significantly slower than the >> first. I have a dual head G400, and I don't use the second head >> because the maximum resolution is 1280x1024. The G550 may be >> acceptable. > > Ahh... Wasn't thinking about that. I think the G550 has increased refresh > rates and resolutions overall... Yes, I'd expect that. I know the G450 was better than the G400, but not enough for my liking. > Don't have the specs handy, though, so I don't know the exact > numbers. They CAN use different resolutions and refresh rates on > each port, though, which is nice, especially with mismatched > monitors. Correct. I'm writing this on the primary head of the G400 running at 2048x1536. My problem is that all my monitors will do much more than the second head of the G400. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message