From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 13 10:02:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CB3A106566B for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 10:02:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gausus@gausus.net) Received: from dagobah.intersec.pl (dagobah.intersec.pl [91.192.226.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC8118FC1C for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 10:02:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dagobah.intersec.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1216F254002; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:11:50 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at intersec.pl Received: from dagobah.intersec.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dagobah.intersec.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1TzauvAGICE3; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:11:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dagobah.intersec.pl (dagobah.intersec.pl [91.192.226.10]) by dagobah.intersec.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53EF9254001; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:11:45 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 12:11:45 +0200 (CEST) From: Maciej Jan Broniarz To: Kevin Downey Message-ID: <88656044.63711252836705223.JavaMail.root@dagobah.intersec.pl> In-Reply-To: <1d3ed48c0909121425g4a255ebah293ce39e42623ab8@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [85.222.122.69] X-Mailer: Zimbra 5.0.16_GA_2921.UBUNTU8_64 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Mac)/5.0.16_GA_2921.UBUNTU8_64) Cc: freebsd-stable Subject: Re: problem with link aggregation failover X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 10:02:40 -0000 Hello, > xl0 and fxp0 both need to have the same mac address I have configured the same mac on both cards.=20 My lagg0 looks like this: lagg0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu 15= 00 =09options=3D9 =09ether 00:01:02:20:24:ef =09inet 192.168.1.104 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 =09media: Ethernet autoselect =09status: active =09laggproto failover =09laggport: fxp0 flags=3D0<> =09laggport: xl0 flags=3D5 When I disconnect the cable from xl0, the network connection dies, and my l= agg0 looks like this: lagg0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu 15= 00 =09options=3D9 =09ether 00:01:02:20:24:ef =09inet 192.168.1.104 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 =09media: Ethernet autoselect =09status: active =09laggproto failover =09laggport: fxp0 flags=3D4 =09laggport: xl0 flags=3D1 Still, if I start pinging anything from that host, the connections comes ba= ck to live: lagg0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu 15= 00 =09options=3D9 =09ether 00:01:02:20:24:ef =09inet 192.168.1.104 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 =09media: Ethernet autoselect =09status: active =09laggproto failover =09laggport: fxp0 flags=3D4 =09laggport: xl0 flags=3D1 What might be the problem with that setup? Thanks for your help, mjb =20 > On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Maciej Jan Broniarz > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I am trying to configure lagg failover mode on 7.2. > > > > I do: > > > > # ifconfig xl0 up > > # ifconfig fxp0 up > > # ifconfig lagg0 create > > # ifconfig lagg0 up laggproto failover laggport xl0 laggport fxp0 > > # dhclient lagg0 > > > > And all seems to work ok. Still I disconnect the cable from the > master card the connection stops. > > Although fxp0 becomes active the connection is still dead. If I > start pinging any host from that machine > > the conection comes back to live, but having ping in background all > the time is not the solution. > > > > Am I doing something wrong or have I missed something in the > configuration? > > > > Best regards, > > mjb > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > And what is good, Phaedrus, > And what is not good=E2=80=94 > Need we ask anyone to tell us these things?