Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 13 Aug 2006 14:51:31 -0600 (MDT)
From:      "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
Cc:        deischen@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, fullermd@over-yonder.net, thompsa@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Where is thr_getscheduler
Message-ID:  <20060813.145131.1172764406.imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060802172505.GA1935@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
References:  <20060802165604.GA970@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0608021303120.7796@sea.ntplx.net> <20060802172505.GA1935@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20060802172505.GA1935@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
            Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> writes:
: Almost everything on a FreeBSD system depends on libc.  Bumping
: its version number without careful coordination of bumping all
: other version numbers is full of landmines.  Falling back of the
: retort "this is -current expect problesm" just glosses over what
: appears to be sloppy planning. 

I'm really hoping that we can stop bumping major versions of libc.so.7
when we go to versioned symbols.

Warner



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060813.145131.1172764406.imp>