From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 15 07:41:17 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62C2790; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 07:41:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DF392CD2; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 07:41:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jre-mbp.elischer.org (etroy.elischer.org [121.45.226.51]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.14.7/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r7F7fAvg020956 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 15 Aug 2013 00:41:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <520C8611.4030707@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 15:41:05 +0800 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Oberman Subject: Re: TSO and FreeBSD vs Linux References: <520A6D07.5080106@freebsd.org> <520AFBE8.1090109@freebsd.org> <520B24A0.4000706@freebsd.org> <520B3056.1000804@freebsd.org> <520BDEAE.9000104@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Lawrence Stewart , FreeBSD Net X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 07:41:17 -0000 On 8/15/13 7:27 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Julian Elischer > > wrote: > > > so I ran on 9.2-beta ( a week or two old) and it had similar > problems.. > only worse.. 9.2 actually sends multiple packets when is doesn't > need to.. > http://people.freebsd.org/~julian/fbsd9.png > > > > Ack! (Sorry) I could have sworn that this had been fixed. Has it > been re-broken? I don't really know why it did that, but maybe its' something to do with the code that tries to avoid sending more than 16 mbufs to the Xen network.. > -- > R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer > E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com