Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 17:22:01 +0100 From: Graham Perrin <grahamperrin@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Deprecation of portsnap Message-ID: <b63ae7f2-b626-df22-2298-c33303856b90@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <ef7dbded-47c4-7eab-8245-869b56f92569@safeport.com> References: <CANR6Wa714iTeTmtW1S3BnoN1-PYgTf%2BkEG4Wf_OJdqH=wzmTzQ@mail.gmail.com> <o7eVTOZAQ7CJJcX5lZZMEyvtUQqcGtdXV02KKaZLLtl-F0pvb8acVD-hQNlFYkzo4nNbQYTdZxAnNnuEjz9XrPwSSy9YsRm5UEJLG-gAocw=@dstev.net> <Iu4M0d0Oy1cXUo9LfR-Fp6ABuDYdElGNAv_zobIpLcBWfhXSzgyDB3xeRdzg9DGsnKWHhe8XjrIhL85afaI0Ohx-SkkrvmP7GsO4u2G5V90=@dstev.net> <ef7dbded-47c4-7eab-8245-869b56f92569@safeport.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 07/04/2021 16:02, doug@safeport.com wrote: > … I assume EOL for portsnap is in the near future. … I should not expect deprecation until some time after the final RELEASE of 12.⋯ reaches end of life. <https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2020-August/119114.html <https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2020-August/119114.html>>; as a reminder that "… 11.x and 12.x will have it of course, …". (I have seen some confusion from premature declarations that portsnap _is_ deprecated.) HTH
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b63ae7f2-b626-df22-2298-c33303856b90>