From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Mar 6 07:00:09 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id HAA25554 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 6 Mar 1996 07:00:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from terra.Sarnoff.COM (terra.sarnoff.com [130.33.11.203]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id HAA25501 for ; Wed, 6 Mar 1996 07:00:03 -0800 (PST) Received: (from rminnich@localhost) by terra.Sarnoff.COM (8.6.12/8.6.12) id JAA24572; Wed, 6 Mar 1996 09:56:10 -0500 Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 09:56:09 -0500 (EST) From: "Ron G. Minnich" To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux vs FreeBSD comparison - it's time, I think! In-Reply-To: <15186.826114396@time.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Sounds fine to me, but I think we should make an effort to be absolutely fair and to show some integrity. All numbers should be verified with 2 or more people, and pointers to the results should be maintained. If we get a rep for playing fast and loose with the facts then we have a problem. If we get a rep for being honest and being willing to give linux its due (and it does have its good points) then we get to be an honest broker. ron Ron Minnich |" Microsoft Word: It does so little and it does rminnich@sarnoff.com | it so slowly" -- Maya Gokhale (609)-734-3120 | ftp://ftp.sarnoff.com/pub/mnfs/www/docs/cluster.html