From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 23 17:14:20 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: x11@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B41E667 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 17:14:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63598271 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 17:14:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s9NHEKq0030190 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 17:14:20 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 191776] Request add developer version of Xorg x11/xorg-devel Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 17:14:20 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Infrastructure X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: wjenkner@inode.at X-Bugzilla-Status: Issue Resolved X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 17:14:20 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D191776 wjenkner@inode.at changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wjenkner@inode.at --- Comment #9 from wjenkner@inode.at --- (In reply to Jean-S=C3=A9bastien P=C3=A9dron from comment #8) > xf86-video-ati-7.5.0 will be available in the future too. We didn't commit > 7.4.0 because it crashes for some users. So as soon as we are comfortable > with 7.5.0, it will hit the Ports tree. Do you mean it "crashes" in the sense that the X server aborts? I had this problem when compiling with clang, but it was sufficient to just address the two warning messages (with the suggested fixes) emitted during compilation of xf86-video-ati (see attached patch). I don't know if this i= s a programming error or a clang optimization error, though. (And where did users report this kind of breakage in the experimental branc= h?) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.=