From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 9 06:50:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6499916A4E9 for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 06:50:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from styx.qala.com.sg (styx.qala.com.sg [210.193.2.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F285643D7B for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 06:50:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhfoo@nexlabs.com) Received: from [192.168.1.200] (130.210-193-15.adsl.qala.com.sg [210.193.15.130]) by styx.qala.com.sg (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15B0134EE3; Mon, 9 May 2005 14:48:31 +0800 (SGT) Message-ID: <427F08D9.6010700@nexlabs.com> Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 14:53:13 +0800 From: Foo Ji-Haw User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <427EE0F2.3090709@nexlabs.com> <20050509064637.GA83454@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050509064637.GA83454@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is 4.11 still a good idea? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 06:50:32 -0000 Your point conflicts with the previous reply, that 5.3 is too cutting-edge. By the way, is there native support for Java 1.4 on FreeBSD 5.x? It broke in my ports installation. I did manage to get the Linux compatible version up though. Kris Kennaway wrote: >On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 12:02:58PM +0800, Foo Ji-Haw wrote: > > >>Hi guys, >> >>I'm thinking of installing 4.11 on my next server, seeing that we have >>some Java issues on the 5.x series (I've been informed that native Java >>on 5.x is not a good idea). >> >> > >Why not? > > > >>Can I get some feedback on whether development and/ or support on 4.11 >>is still active and updated? I've spent quite some time on the 4.x >>series, so I am quite comfortable with it. >> >> > >It's certainly not very active. Some developers still have an >interest in it, but most of the development and bug fixing activity >goes into the 5.x and 6.x branches. > >Kris > >