From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Sep 8 19:43:30 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45E5BDE9FA for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 19:43:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@boosten.org) Received: from smtpq5.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq5.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.42.168]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46RMCz43zFz40jY for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 19:43:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@boosten.org) Received: from [212.54.42.134] (helo=smtp10.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq5.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i735n-00052M-Sn; Sun, 08 Sep 2019 21:43:23 +0200 Received: from 84-25-247-31.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl ([84.25.247.31] helo=smtp.boosten.org) by smtp10.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i735n-00056b-Kk; Sun, 08 Sep 2019 21:43:23 +0200 Received: from amon.boosten.org (amon.boosten.org [192.168.13.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.boosten.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A64184CEC7; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 21:43:22 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: Re: Oddity in calendar output From: freebsd@boosten.org In-Reply-To: <86ftl6rd7c.fsf@elm.localnet> Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 21:43:21 +0200 Cc: Aleksandr via freebsd-questions Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <86ftl6rd7c.fsf@elm.localnet> To: Carl Johnson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-SourceIP: 84.25.247.31 X-Ziggo-spambar: / X-Ziggo-spamscore: 0.0 X-Ziggo-spamreport: CMAE Analysis: v=2.3 cv=ccmsUULM c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=JWBJsaPp29SgP5DpYRBqZw==:17 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=J70Eh1EUuV4A:10 a=U9OQpdHBAAAA:8 a=8CdjIenJs_q5rRp-azgA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=JjNKjOT4mCc3WEV1ObP8:22 X-Ziggo-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Flag: No X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46RMCz43zFz40jY X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.84 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[boosten.org:s=myselector]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:212.54.32.0/19]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(-1.24)[ipnet: 212.54.32.0/20(-3.92), asn: 33915(-2.28), country: NL(0.01)]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[boosten.org:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[boosten.org,quarantine]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[168.42.54.212.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[31.247.25.84.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:33915, ipnet:212.54.32.0/20, country:NL]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2019 19:43:30 -0000 > Op 8 sep. 2019, om 17:59 heeft Carl Johnson het = volgende geschreven: >=20 > I just realized that one calendar(1) entry seems to be notifying me in > the wrong week. I have a calendar entry:=20 > September SatSecond Shrewsbury Fair (2 days) > in my ~/calendar file to notify me on the second Saturday, but it > notified me on the first Saturday. I get the following results: > $ calendar -t 07-09-2019 > Sep 7* Shrewsbury Fair (2 days) > $ calendar -t 14-09-2019 > $ > September 7 is clearly the first Saturday, so why does it think that = it > is the second Saturday and the 14th is not? I also tried changing > 'SatSecond' to 'Sat+2', but that gives the same result. >=20 > Am I missing something obvious, or should I file a PR on this? Thanks > for any suggestions. It only seems to be wrong for this years September. Next year it=E2=80=99s= okay again. Also, if you change the month to October, it works like it = should. Peter=