From owner-freebsd-current Wed Apr 21 10:49: 5 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from spinner.netplex.com.au (spinner.netplex.com.au [202.12.86.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F42D15858 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 1999 10:47:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) Received: from netplex.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spinner.netplex.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECEC61F2A; Thu, 22 Apr 1999 01:45:01 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Matthew Reimer Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: solid NFS patch #6 avail for -current - need testers files) In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 21 Apr 1999 09:53:56 MST." <371E02A4.64691949@vpop.net> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1999 01:45:01 +0800 From: Peter Wemm Message-Id: <19990421174502.ECEC61F2A@spinner.netplex.com.au> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Matthew Reimer wrote: > Great work guys! It almost seems that -current is more stable than > -stable! > > Matt Funny you should mention it. I've heard this from a number of people over the last week.. One has even suggested using a particular known-good 4.0 snapshot in preference to a 3.1-stable for a production system...... Cheers, -Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message