From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Nov  6 11:44:41 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23A13E59
 for <freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org>; Tue,  6 Nov 2012 11:44:41 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D938FC08;
 Tue,  6 Nov 2012 11:44:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA6BiefW013319;
 Tue, 6 Nov 2012 11:44:40 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from bapt@localhost)
 by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qA6Bidc9013318;
 Tue, 6 Nov 2012 11:44:39 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to
 bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 12:44:37 +0100
From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
To: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>
Subject: Re: Current problem reports assigned to emulation@FreeBSD.org
Message-ID: <20121106114437.GA512@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
References: <201211051106.qA5B6SUu000999@freefall.freebsd.org>
 <5097B159.3080600@coosemans.org> <5097DB3B.1070307@passap.ru>
 <CAF6rxgm-nkkQZSkqB5fqP3yK2wY4RhjpXfeKat8sjoifju6Z6A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgm-nkkQZSkqB5fqP3yK2wY4RhjpXfeKat8sjoifju6Z6A@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems
 <freebsd-emulation.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-emulation>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 11:44:41 -0000


--dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 12:32:39PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 5 November 2012 10:28, Boris Samorodov <bsam@passap.ru> wrote:
> >> Can I politely ask for emulation@ to give up maintainership for this p=
ort?
> >> Nobody here keeps this port updated and when patches are submitted nob=
ody
> >> commits them.
>=20
> This is false. I maintain the flash port (with an emulation@ hat).  I
> thought such PRs were supposed to be auto-assigned to me. I will look
> into why they are not.
>=20
>=20
> > Any committer may commit this PR with log:
> > "Approved by: emulation@ (maintainer timeout XX weeks)"
>=20
> teams don't time out.

Since when (any rules to say that?)? imho that would be incredibly stupid t=
hat a team do not timeout,
what happen in the case noone from a team have a look to a PR because of
ENOTIME, or lack of resources or interest?

regards,
Bapt

--dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAlCY+CUACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExC0wCfTcF9Dtd+BhPai7MVOp3FOdOj
Fp8AnRnxkDxSx2rJNI98kZaLfon0vF/5
=4y5r
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx--