From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Feb 7 16:24:39 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29B7EAA1A92 for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2016 16:24:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A61371FFC for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2016 16:24:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id u17GOZIl065223; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 03:24:35 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 03:24:35 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Christoph Brinkhaus cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn revision in uname In-Reply-To: <20160207153505.GA1420@esprimo.local> Message-ID: <20160208024820.K51785@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20160207223554.P51785@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <56B73E8C.5060501@FreeBSD.org> <20160207153505.GA1420@esprimo.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2016 16:24:39 -0000 On Sun, 7 Feb 2016 16:35:05 +0100, Christoph Brinkhaus wrote: > On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 12:54:36PM +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > On 07/02/2016 12:11, Ian Smith wrote: > > > I've been using svnup for source updates for ages, and for my occasional > > > use it works fine. However one thing you don't get is the svn revision > > > shown in uname, eg % uname -vm > > > FreeBSD 9.3-STABLE #0: Thu Oct 29 03:18:26 EST 2015 > > > root@x200.smithi.id.au:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > % svnversion /usr/src > > 295073M > > > > If that fails, it will try running svnliteversion, and then cycle > > through various different ways of extracting a version string from other > > VCSes until it gets a result. > > The version svnlite is part of the system and > does not need to be installed separately. On 10.x - since 10.1 maybe? - but not on 9.x. > Here svnliteversion /usr/src works. If you're pulling sources with svnlite, so it should :) Conversion between using svn and svnup, either way, requires some care and cleaning up; generally best advice is not to try mixing these methods. cheers, Ian