From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue May 20 14:25:58 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA27098 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 20 May 1997 14:25:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from numachi.numachi.com (numachi.numachi.com [198.175.254.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA27077 for ; Tue, 20 May 1997 14:25:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from reichert@localhost) by numachi.numachi.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id RAA20722; Tue, 20 May 1997 17:25:23 -0400 Message-ID: <19970520172523.42306@numachi.numachi.com> Date: Tue, 20 May 1997 17:25:23 -0400 From: Brian Reichert To: Ben Black Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can't find my gateway with ep0 interface References: <19970520161421.50281@numachi.numachi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.68 In-Reply-To: ; from Ben Black on Tue, May 20, 1997 at 04:11:16PM -0400 Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, May 20, 1997 at 04:11:16PM -0400, Ben Black wrote: > urm, i don't know what you mean by ISA mode. it is always ISA, the > question is whether it has PnP disabled. if you did not use the > 3c5x9cfg.exe utility to disable PnP then it is still active. also, what > interrupt are you using for the card? is that what the kernel detects? > is that what the kernel expects? Quite right, I misinterpreted that line. My terminology was based on NT's perception of the card; when it's not in PnP mode, it's simply reported as 'ISA'. Nonetheless, PnP has been disabled. No 'test mode' or 'pencil mark' messages at all. Again, my dmesg dump: % dmesg [...] 1 3C5x9 board(s) on ISA found at 0x210 ep0 at 0x210-0x21f irq 11 on isa ep0: aui/utp/bnc[*UTP*] address 00:20:af:d2:c7:ef [...] It was found at IRQ 11, which is what the kernel was compiled to look for. -- Brian 'you Bastard' Reichert reichert@numachi.com 37 Crystal Ave. #303 Derry NH 03038-1713 USA Intel architecture: the left-hand path