From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Sat Jun 16 21:27:44 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A75D1023279; Sat, 16 Jun 2018 21:27:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@freebsd.org) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A712A702F3; Sat, 16 Jun 2018 21:27:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@freebsd.org) Received: from yv.noip.me (c-24-4-131-132.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.131.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id w5GLRgr0080627 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 16 Jun 2018 14:27:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-24-4-131-132.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.131.132] claimed to be yv.noip.me Reply-To: yuri@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r472566 - head/science/gromacs To: Adam Weinberger Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org References: <201806162107.w5GL7BNd098574@repo.freebsd.org> From: Yuri Message-ID: <09e07c15-d4b9-3c1a-8682-d85a4ccf7bbd@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2018 14:27:41 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2018 21:27:44 -0000 On 06/16/18 14:21, Adam Weinberger wrote: > That's definitely a sub-optimal situation. In the future please try to > track down the changes before accepting a re-rolled tarball, including > talking to upstream if necessary. There's lots of risk in a tarball > that gets re-rolled without notice. I wrote to the upstream maintainer asking him to not do this in the future. Will certainly handle this better next time. Have a great weekend! Yuri