Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 13:07:42 -0700 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: Michael Lucas <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org> Cc: doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: When does a Q become FA? Message-ID: <20010516130742.A23324@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> In-Reply-To: <20010516155016.A12476@blackhelicopters.org>; from mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org on Wed, May 16, 2001 at 03:50:16PM -0400 References: <20010516155016.A12476@blackhelicopters.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 03:50:16PM -0400, Michael Lucas wrote: > I had a server crash on me yesterday. Fortunately, it gave warnings > about increasing PMAP_SHPGPERPROC. A quick mailing list archive > search found the cause & solutions. >=20 > The "quick archive search" returned many different threads, all with > the same problem. >=20 > So, are things like this suitable for inclusion in the FAQ? Or is the > mailing list archive considered an adequate info source? Personaly, I'd say it's met the FA requirement if it's got many threads. The FAQ is superior to the archives in that it's a reasionable size (i.e. you could put it on a PDA or print it). -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7At4NXY6L6fI4GtQRAqK2AKCRAxOm8oFlsICv+VZYCZfctLjGpgCgwF49 YjPMmAp+vRr4KT9dkdk4QUw= =ixkm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010516130742.A23324>