Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 24 Nov 1997 10:54:17 -0500
From:      "Pedro F. Giffuni" <giffunip@asme.org>
To:        Thomas Gellekum <tg@ihf.rwth-aachen.de>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org, jmz@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: ports/5120: Update to BLAS lib. (math port)
Message-ID:  <3479A329.167EB0E7@asme.org>
References:  <199711241300.FAA00703@hub.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thomas Gellekum wrote:
> 
> The following reply was made to PR ports/5120; it has been noted by GNATS.
> 
> From: Thomas Gellekum <tg@ihf.rwth-aachen.de>
> To: giffunip@asme.org
> Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG, jmz@FreeBSD.ORG
> Subject: Re: ports/5120: Update to BLAS lib. (math port)
> Date: 24 Nov 1997 13:51:50 +0100
> 
>  giffunip@asme.org writes:
>  > linpack, eispack, and lapack ports, most be modified (slightly) to use
>  > libblas instead of libcor.
> 
>  lapack comes with its own libblas. Do you know where the difference
>  is?
> 
>  tg

Both come from netlib, but the independent BLAS is updated more
regularly. The updated blas version is bigger and maybe more efficent.
The only other difference there might be is that the independent blas
port includes levels 1, 2 and 3, while lapack may offer a subset.
Anyway, there shouldn`t be any problem.

hope that helps,

        Pedro.

BTW, it should be evident, but remember to nuke the "patches" dir on
BLAS.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3479A329.167EB0E7>