From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 30 21:13:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18746106566B for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:13:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from astrodog@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f189.google.com (mail-iw0-f189.google.com [209.85.223.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D42088FC20 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:13:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn27 with SMTP id 27so2386543iwn.7 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:13:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:cc:content-type; bh=KwXGIVF/+TMiznBoubv5mpigrPtUcbDXr8QSNP6fZjQ=; b=k+mdD/arMv8N3XzTRM4cSq+zAzo5bITJucjKiBXy/KJ3tBlJp0M0FDJpbJOSj30PdG 2OxfhWVO8AP4VmTQhzjsQ8fDrcdhug3XELn9NQzcYpwI2D34bhaxghDsMeuBuspotK59 4NMGN/Kpy2xF3BthgBamG8PzviQMdLnLCBBp4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; b=BxsIfQf4LjEAcANC2w2Z611NJL7NV6ICPEVGmOg6HqqShmrmAGSP7BbSuOi3dACeQh dwWFkAboiXvHKKYY1eiN9SlbMaZ1YnW47rIdBMUmmZDFb09O6FCkV8ZFZvJUZVVZkWpS LcWeU59m5CETuPr1ZEUC2UQNYdtLfujFUps98= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.26.131 with SMTP id e3mr2072016ibc.0.1256935788937; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:49:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4AEAECE0.1040704@loveturtle.net> References: <4AE5F897.3000103@rawbw.com> <20091029182739.GA22923@ei.bzerk.org> <20091029145843.Q98757@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> <200910301018.25483.j.mckeown@ru.ac.za> <4AEAECE0.1040704@loveturtle.net> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:49:48 -0500 Message-ID: <2fd864e0910301349x3a17326r264b7e4e423f99db@mail.gmail.com> From: Astrodog Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: Why is sendmail is part of the system and not a package? X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:13:13 -0000 I would just like to point out that no one has considered the possibility of, perhaps, painting the bikeshed with a pattern using multiple colors, or perhaps even varying grades of reflective paint. This would make it significantly more pleasing to the eye... and with shiny paint, we can also attract significantly more users. --- Harrison