From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu May 16 02:04:29 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id CAA09946 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 16 May 1996 02:04:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smoke.microwiz.com (smoke.microwiz.com [206.100.22.130]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA09941 for ; Thu, 16 May 1996 02:04:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jpm.microwiz.com (jpm.microwiz.com [206.100.22.140]) by smoke.microwiz.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id CAA16328 Thu, 16 May 1996 02:05:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199605160905.CAA16328@smoke.microwiz.com> Comments: Authenticated sender is From: "John McNamee" Organization: MicroWizards To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, mark@quickweb.com Date: Thu, 16 May 1996 02:05:43 PST Subject: Re: BSDI binary support Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.33) Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > How compatible is FreeBSD (2.1R) with BSDI binaries? The reason I ask is > that I run the BSDI versions of the Netscape Proxy server with no > problems, but I just tried setting up the BSDI 2.1 binaries for the > Microsoft FrontPage server extensions (for web authoring..) and all of > their binaries just core dump on me.. what's the reason for this? I installed the FrontPage extensions on one of my 2.1-STABLE systems. I ran fpsrvadm without incident (e.g. no core dump), but I haven't got FrontPage to actually work (the Web Explorer won't accept my password). I haven't spent much time looking at the problem, so I can't say if it's something stupid on my part or a real incompatibility. -- John McNamee MicroWizards Voice: 702-825-3535 / FAX: 702-825-3443 http://www.microwiz.com