From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 28 21:02:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236AF16A41F; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:02:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 461E1444B4; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:02:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2679E2096; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 23:02:21 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Learn: ham X-Spam-Score: -2.4/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on tim.des.no Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A152081; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 23:02:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E520433C8D; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 23:02:20 +0200 (CEST) From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: John Baldwin References: <200603281528.41502.jhb@freebsd.org> <200603281538.21743.jhb@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 23:02:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: <200603281538.21743.jhb@freebsd.org> (John Baldwin's message of "Tue, 28 Mar 2006 15:38:18 -0500") Message-ID: <86y7yuuvtv.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Daniel Eischen , cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/include atomic.h X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:02:29 -0000 John Baldwin writes: > The different placement of volatile broken sparc64 though. However, > an MI wrapper would work around that issue. I can pursue a patch > that adds the wrapper unless one of you two wants to do it. I'll handle it. > I really wish you'd have spoken up earlier though. This was changed > back in July. We can't all keep track of everything all the time. Back in July I had no interest in this part of the tree. (in fact, back in July I had so little time left over for FreeBSD that I didn't read July's commit logs until late fall) DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no