From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 24 17:54:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0756B106564A; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:54:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C80B58FC0C; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:54:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbrp2 with SMTP id rp2so3988882pbb.13 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:54:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=RIxhkqU3dxI0SwIa2RVPjj9sZQ8wNF+kgHq6WuSNT/Y=; b=04g2aqrcqAc1cdHX/dElofgXiKFN66J7ko5FbYbO8BXJUMXIOuii4sf9hPvSXb1Nzu saEH6cDGGZT60j+JQXUIU3Qh4AszuFnR1GIBafqIXh7NIoxe7zwC374CrDwiciJS7dJ8 f7gmyOOMv4ZPh1V7fCfiIr8XCDSfWXFY34xVxhrjpG7H0NGz8Z+5tg/VcGGjjDA9+oZ4 53m8Mp9r7WFtdMvM9odnhbssSmQtQscH6e50hRmUqKMlHpIJTQOGtlvTDw7vw3gJYWJd GOfqntCCwPf7P2f/b2V1nIbbzBDASzQhu/lqFTf5ixnwnEiuEJr5RuTXbYcwba5g0tiQ Aa6w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.66.85.4 with SMTP id d4mr12480199paz.11.1345830866371; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:54:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.36.106 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:54:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201208241951.06694.bschmidt@techwires.net> References: <199007581.20120824202155@serebryakov.spb.ru> <201208241910.35576.bschmidt@techwires.net> <201208241951.06694.bschmidt@techwires.net> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:54:26 -0700 Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: Bernhard Schmidt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Feature-poor default WPA userland software (hostapd, wpa_supplicant) configuration -- is it inetntional? X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:54:27 -0000 On 24 August 2012 10:51, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: >> There's also likely a whole bunch of driver and stack things we need. >> Eg, we need correct VLAN handling (which is fine, we SHOULD have it in >> net80211, I just don't think it's been tested in a long time.) There's >> also off-channel traffic support which I know we don't currently do. > > Na.. not VLAN over WLAN (well, yeah, that needs to be looked into > also), hostapd is able to shove STAs into different VLANs (on the wired > interface) based on Radius rules. Right. I wonder what the "vlan" tag in the net80211 node is for. Is that for VLAN over WLAN? Yeah, being able to map a STA into a VLAN would be cool, but then we'd have to figure out where to do the bridging and how to tell net80211 to do that mapping to vlan subinterfaces.. Adrian