From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Thu Oct 13 13:13:24 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC79C10506 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 13:13:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from li-fbsd@citylink.dinoex.sub.org) Received: from uucp.dinoex.sub.de (uucp.dinoex.sub.de [IPv6:2001:1440:5001:1::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "uucp.dinoex.sub.de", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 DV Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D961197 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 13:13:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from li-fbsd@citylink.dinoex.sub.org) Received: from uucp.dinoex.sub.de (uucp.dinoex.sub.de [194.45.71.2]) by uucp.dinoex.sub.de (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPS id u9DDDAHo044764 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 15:13:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from li-fbsd@citylink.dinoex.sub.org) X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: Received: from citylink.dinoex.sub.org (uucp@localhost) by uucp.dinoex.sub.de (8.15.2/8.14.9/Submit) with UUCP id u9DDDAsL044763 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 15:13:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from li-fbsd@citylink.dinoex.sub.org) Received: from gate.oper.dinoex.org (gate-e [192.168.98.2]) by citylink.dinoex.sub.de (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u9DCOrH7034986 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 14:24:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from li-fbsd@citylink.dinoex.sub.org) Received: from gate.oper.dinoex.org (gate-e [192.168.98.2]) by gate.oper.dinoex.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u9DCO22S034839 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 14:24:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from li-fbsd@citylink.dinoex.sub.org) Received: (from news@localhost) by gate.oper.dinoex.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id u9DCO26F034838 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 14:24:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from li-fbsd@citylink.dinoex.sub.org) X-Authentication-Warning: gate.oper.dinoex.org: news set sender to li-fbsd@citylink.dinoex.sub.org using -f From: Peter Subject: Re: ZFS l2arc broken in 10.3 Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 14:16:36 +0200 Organization: even some more stinky socks Message-ID: References: <530d4222-535e-b29d-aba7-9520644dc6e5@ingresso.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 12:17:10 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: oper.dinoex.de; logging-data="33908"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@citylink.dinoex.sub.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/42.0 SeaMonkey/2.39 In-Reply-To: <530d4222-535e-b29d-aba7-9520644dc6e5@ingresso.co.uk> Sender: li-fbsd@citylink.dinoex.sub.org To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: uucp.dinoex.sub.de; Sender-ip: 194.45.71.2; Sender-helo: uucp.dinoex.sub.de; ) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (uucp.dinoex.sub.de [194.45.71.2]); Thu, 13 Oct 2016 15:13:11 +0200 (CEST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 13:13:25 -0000 Pete French wrote: > > Ok, thats a bit worry if true - but I can confirm that l2arc works fine > under 10.3 on amd64, so what you say about cross-compling might be true. > Am taking an inetrest in this as I have just dpeloyed a lot of machines > which are going to be relying on l2arc working to get reasobale performance. Sure on my amd64 it also works fine. AFAIK such things are tolerated when compiling in 64bit. But I was pointed to another point interim: my source is from STABLE branch; in the 10.3 RELEASE the code is different. Obviousely there were recent changes, and that explains why the problem was not yet detected.