From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 25 21:28:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6EFD16A407; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 21:28:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: from mail.digitalfreaks.org (arbitor.digitalfreaks.org [216.151.95.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 826EB43D53; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 21:28:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: by mail.digitalfreaks.org (Postfix, from userid 1022) id 3FE6217F52; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:28:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.digitalfreaks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E8DB17F50; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:28:05 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:28:05 -0400 (EDT) From: "Brian A. Seklecki" X-X-Sender: lavalamp@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org To: Vivek Khera In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20061025170233.E63561@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org> References: <85198155-D6C6-426E-BC50-A91F05C38040@khera.org> <20061024190341.J63561@arbitor.digitalfreaks.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Syslog-ng users' and developers' mailing list , marsgmiro@gmail.com, sem@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [syslog-ng] building 2.0 on freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 21:28:13 -0000 VK: I'd be happy to test a beta of the port for Endian issues on Sparc64 and AMD64. I've also got a variety of 5x and 6x boxes on both archs on which I can smash bugs. Just gotta cane `em. I can also do the NetBSD pkgsrc work in pkgsrc-wip.sf.net ~BAS On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Vivek Khera wrote: > > On Oct 24, 2006, at 7:09 PM, Brian A. Seklecki wrote: > >> You should try to work closely with the FreeBSD port maintainer for >> sysutils/syslog-ng to integrate 2.x into a Port. Unless there is a >> liscencing restriction I don't know preventing a enw sysutils/syslog-ng2/ >> port, we're still at 1.6.11 in Ports. > > I am still evaluating whether I will be using this software in our > infrastructure. If I do (which seems likely), I plan to adopt the port once > 2.0 is released. I don't see a compelling reason to keep a separate 2.0 > version of the port as it is back-compatible, and I believe that the base > port name, syslog-ng, should be the latest version always. That's how I > maintain the postfix port, too :-) > l8* -lava (Brian A. Seklecki - Pittsburgh, PA, USA) http://www.spiritual-machines.org/ "...from back in the heady days when "helpdesk" meant nothing, "diskquota" meant everything, and lives could be bought and sold for a couple of pages of laser printout - and frequently were."