From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jan 2 19:30:23 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from rah.star-gate.com (216-200-29-190.snj0.flashcom.net [216.200.29.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F3614E14; Sun, 2 Jan 2000 19:30:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA01403; Sun, 2 Jan 2000 19:30:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Message-Id: <200001030330.TAA01403@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Karl Denninger Cc: "Jonathan M. Bresler" , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Your misleading, no, LYING message to me In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 02 Jan 2000 21:11:03 CST." <20000102211103.A27302@Denninger.Net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2000 19:30:12 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have to say that PHK has become the MASTER at pissing people off, ensuring that his opponent goes the deep end and staying calm so the blame obviously does not fall on him. Got to admit his formula is very very nice 8) By a long shot the problem is NOT Karl. It takes at least TWO to engage in a combatitive conflict -- that is if you are not schizophreniac. The proper tactic to resolve the conflict should have been to wait a cool off period and then slug it off technically. Nevertheless, instead of waiting for Karl to cool off and attempt to ration with him , it was much easier to drive him further down: hence thru censorship the "technical" argument was won with virtually no technical effort at all -- Like I said earlier very very nice tactic ! -- Amancio Hasty hasty@rah.star-gate.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message