Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 11:28:46 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> To: Drew Derbyshire <ahd@kew.com> Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CVS network access - pserver vs. NFS Message-ID: <20020713102846.GB20663@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophi> In-Reply-To: <20020713035437.5B8CB3BE@minerva.hh.kew.com> References: <20020713035437.5B8CB3BE@minerva.hh.kew.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 11:54:37PM -0400, Drew Derbyshire wrote: > Which is faster for remote CVS access over a dedicated 100 MB/second > LAN, using an NFS remote mount or running a cvspserver? There's not a lot in it. Besides, I can't imagine how cvs(1) is going to be that performance critical. Exactly how often do you check files in and out during the development process? With CVS the security considerations are probably more important. pserver is clearly the best for untrusted users --- so long as you take note of the `Security considerations with password authentication' node in the CVS info pages (http://developer.apple.com/techpubs/macosx/Commands/cvs/cvs_29.html#SEC30, http://developer.apple.com/techpubs/macosx/Commands/cvs/cvs_31.html#SEC32) However, if you trust your users enough to export NFS directories to them, then running CVS over NFS won't add any extra security hurdles and it may be a tad more convenient. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way Tel: +44 1628 476614 Marlow Fax: +44 0870 0522645 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020713102846.GB20663>