From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Apr 24 03:49:48 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id DAA07625
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 24 Apr 1996 03:49:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ra.dkuug.dk ([130.225.204.52])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id DAA07613
          Wed, 24 Apr 1996 03:49:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from sos@localhost) by ra.dkuug.dk (8.6.12/8.6.12) id MAA07022; Wed, 24 Apr 1996 12:41:43 +0200
Message-Id: <199604241041.MAA07022@ra.dkuug.dk>
Subject: Re: Anybody playe with ip_filter ??
To: phk@critter.tfs.com (Poul-Henning Kamp)
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 12:41:43 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: sos@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <10842.830341385@critter.tfs.com> from "Poul-Henning Kamp" at Apr 24, 96 10:23:05 am
From: sos@FreeBSD.ORG
Reply-to: sos@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In reply to Poul-Henning Kamp who wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I seems it'll do what I need, anybody got any experience before
> > I dig in, and should we put in the patches in the kernel, making
> > it easy to use ??
> 
> I have talked with the author, and we kind of agreed to get it in.
> 
> The present kernel interface to ipfw should fit ip_filter fine,
> and we should have no need to modify it further I think...

Super, who is going to do that & when :)


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Soren Schmidt             (sos@FreeBSD.org)             FreeBSD Core Team
               So much code to hack -- so little time.