From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 13 17:26:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 779F916A4CE for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 17:26:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F4CE43D58 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 17:26:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior-wifi.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iBDHT7vK041815; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:29:07 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <41BDD0B2.5050505@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:26:10 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040929 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Voras References: <20041213081021.A9536@mail.chesapeake.net> <41BDC83C.4070604@fer.hr> In-Reply-To: <41BDC83C.4070604@fer.hr> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pooker.samsco.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern sched_ule.c (fwd) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 17:26:35 -0000 Ivan Voras wrote: > Jeff Roberson wrote: > >> ULE works again with preemption and kse and so on. As far as I know, the >> only three problems with ULE currently are these: > > > Nice! Will it get to RELENG_5 soon? I'd like to try it but don't want to > switch to -current for it :) > RELENG_5 is the stable branch. If quality testing goes into ULE in HEAD and it's shown to be as stable as 4BSD then we can consider it for RELENG_5 in the future. Given the incredible problems that we had in the scheduler leading up to 5.3, I'm not excited about quickly merging these things. Scott