From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 24 19:01:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 553151065670 for ; Sun, 24 May 2009 19:01:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from craig001@lerwick.hopto.org) Received: from lerwick.hopto.org (81-178-20-70.dsl.pipex.com [81.178.20.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2DC8FC0A for ; Sun, 24 May 2009 19:01:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from craig001@lerwick.hopto.org) Received: (qmail 8443 invoked by uid 98); 24 May 2009 20:05:29 +0100 Received: from 192.168.0.2 by polaris.lerwick.hopto.org (envelope-from , uid 82) with qmail-scanner-2.01 (clamdscan: 0.88.4/1789. hbedv: 7.1.1.11/6.35.1.178. f-prot: 4.6.6/3.16.14. spamassassin: 3.1.4. Clear:RC:1(192.168.0.2):. Processed in 3.690312 secs); 24 May 2009 19:05:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.2?) (192.168.0.2) by lerwick.hopto.org with SMTP; 24 May 2009 20:05:26 +0100 From: Craig Butler To: Mark Linimon In-Reply-To: <20090524151924.GA6058@lonesome.com> References: <20090512215255.GA31766@lonesome.com> <1242380562.40393.18.camel@main.lerwick.hopto.org> <20090524151924.GA6058@lonesome.com> Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 20:01:11 +0100 Message-Id: <1243191671.1371.36.camel@main.lerwick.hopto.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "Adam K." , freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sun Fire 280R questions. X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 19:01:35 -0000 Hi Mark... I can't send mail direct to you, for the last two weeks your mail server has refused to accept it; [root@polaris:~] # cat /var/log/qmail/* | grep 3925: | tai64nlocal 2009-05-24 19:31:14.795506500 starting delivery 3925: msg 10200090 to remote linimon@lonesome.com 2009-05-24 19:32:15.629006500 delivery 3925: deferral: Connected_to_66.135.55.46_but_connection_died._(#4.4.2)/ I've sent 2 mails, the first one returned as undelivered after me mail server tried for a week; I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. : Connected to 66.135.55.46 but connection died. (#4.4.2) I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too long. My comments are in line, On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 10:19 -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:42:42AM +0100, Craig Butler wrote: > > Is there anyway we can link in with Fenners work to list the broken > > ports ? > > Well, his list is "doesn't fetch", but it's broken. That's on my list > of things to fix, and adding the information to portsmon is also. > > > How are we looking build cluster wise, are we able to do complete port > > tree builds ? > > Since a couple of weeks before BSDCan I had been ignoring the sparc64 > builds while I got ready, but I started a new, complete, 7 build a few > days ago, and it is nearly complete. > > I have some replacement disks that I need to ship to ISC to bring > some of the Netras back online. The lerwick machines I have not > been able to configure correctly. We will be losing some of the > York machines in the near future. What do you need Lerwick wise ? I have build1 up and running, but no one been on it for donkeys... The last thing I did was reboot it when ssh got stuck (as it regularly does when building). What happened to York ?? can we ship any units over here ? I would be keen to help get the sparc64 side up to full speed again. I am going to approach Kip and see if I can get involved with porting to the later Ultrasparc T1/T2/Rock's... Massive learning curve but I think it will be useful. > When I get back from vacation I intend to do some cluster maintenance. How long you away for ? hope your having a great holiday. > > > In previous emails its been said that port developers don't have access > > to sparc64 kit, I may be able to help out by providing a jailed > > environment hanging off the end of an adsl line... do you think that > > would be any use ? > > I think it would be in great demand. OK, I'll arrange something, it wont be the quickest, but at least the devs would have access to sparc kit. /Craig B > > mcl