From owner-freebsd-emulation  Thu Dec 18 04:02:56 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id EAA12732
          for emulation-outgoing; Thu, 18 Dec 1997 04:02:56 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-emulation)
Received: from word.smith.net.au (ppp10.portal.net.au [202.12.71.110])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA12722
          for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>; Thu, 18 Dec 1997 04:02:49 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from mike@word.smith.net.au)
Received: from word (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by word.smith.net.au (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA00598;
	Thu, 18 Dec 1997 22:27:18 +1030 (CST)
Message-Id: <199712181157.WAA00598@word.smith.net.au>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97
To: "Sean J. Schluntz" <schluntz@pacbell.net>
cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Linux LKM Emulation Question 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 17 Dec 1997 21:28:28 PDT."
             <199712180525.VAA17675@mail-gw.pacbell.net> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 1997 22:27:17 +1030
From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> I'm going to be running at least one program a lot on my system that is a 
> Linux program (Executor the Mac emulator) and I have 64megs of RAM.  Will 
> I seen any speed increase by building Linux in to the FreeBSD kernel 
> (v2.2.5) over using the LKM, or should I stick with the LKM?

Nothing noticeable.  We've benched it fairly closely (as we use 
Linux-mode code a lot), but haven't come up with any real indication 
one over the other.

mike