From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Feb 28 17:17:31 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7F709A9;
 Fri, 28 Feb 2014 17:17:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.adm.hostpoint.ch (mail.adm.hostpoint.ch
 [IPv6:2a00:d70:0:a::e0])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 656B611BE;
 Fri, 28 Feb 2014 17:17:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from 46-127-132-15.dynamic.hispeed.ch ([46.127.132.15]:56489
 helo=[172.16.1.156])
 by mail.adm.hostpoint.ch with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128)
 (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <markus.gebert@hostpoint.ch>)
 id 1WJR3x-0004po-Ki; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 18:17:29 +0100
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
Subject: Re: Network loss
From: Markus Gebert <markus.gebert@hostpoint.ch>
In-Reply-To: <29112316-5FC9-4DA1-BD0C-BCA61D3997E3@hostpoint.ch>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 18:17:28 +0100
Message-Id: <4D6D6C25-5521-449E-ABD7-63881183566D@hostpoint.ch>
References: <532475749.13937791.1393462831884.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca>
 <76EBC5F0-DA4E-4A60-A10E-093F4E1BD1EF@hostpoint.ch>
 <CAHvs-HUpG9deHHekTdsQxNcZ63=VKHVm4miVLjxw=VzD-wgmrQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <29112316-5FC9-4DA1-BD0C-BCA61D3997E3@hostpoint.ch>
To: Johan Kooijman <mail@johankooijman.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca>,
 Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com>, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 17:17:31 -0000


On 28.02.2014, at 18:15, Markus Gebert <markus.gebert@hostpoint.ch> =
wrote:

>> Ok, so 9.1 is 100% OK then? Do you have any idea about 10.0 ?
>=20
> It=92s at least good enough and way better than 9.2. But you=92ll have =
to test yourself, I don=92t think we=92re running the same hardware.
>=20
> Problem is, that 9.1 will go EOL at some point and we do not know if =
this will be fixed until then.

And no, we didn=92t test 10.0. It hadn=92t been released when we tested, =
and the ixgbe driver was not newer in head at that point.


Markus