From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 14 10:21:56 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DC4737B401 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 10:21:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A30F43F3F for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 10:21:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com) Received: (qmail 17405 invoked by uid 1000); 14 Jul 2003 17:21:56 -0000 Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 10:21:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Nate Lawson To: Mark Santcroos In-Reply-To: <20030714142101.GA1706@laptop.6bone.nl> Message-ID: <20030714102114.O17391@root.org> References: <20030713161722.Y15284@root.org> <20030714142101.GA1706@laptop.6bone.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: acpica 0619 in the tree X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 17:21:56 -0000 On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Mark Santcroos wrote: > I wasn't able to test the update before it was committed, but it doesn't > have any runtime regressions for me so far, so that's good! Good. So far things look ok, no reports of new regression. > However, something I haven't seen reported before, is that it breaks for > the ACPI_DEBUG case. (Which I have in /etc/make.conf) > > The first thing to do is to add the new file dmobject.c to the debugging > section in the modules/acpi/Makefile. > However, there are some more hairy things that prevent it from simply just > working that I am looking into now. A fix has been tested and committed. -Nate