From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Apr 16 06:38:10 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id GAA12008
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 16 Apr 1996 06:38:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dyson.iquest.net (dyson.iquest.net [198.70.144.127])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA12003
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 16 Apr 1996 06:38:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from root@localhost) by dyson.iquest.net (8.7.5/8.6.9) id IAA11876; Tue, 16 Apr 1996 08:37:31 -0500 (EST)
From: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net>
Message-Id: <199604161337.IAA11876@dyson.iquest.net>
Subject: Re: your mail
To: dutchman@spase.nl (Kees Jan Koster)
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 1996 08:37:31 -0500 (EST)
Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <199604160923.LAA01450@phobos.spase.nl> from "Kees Jan Koster" at Apr 16, 96 11:23:56 am
Reply-To: dyson@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> Scores of people must have run bonnie, why is there no list of disks with
> their bonnie results? Someone is bound to use the same cpu and os version
> as I do.
> 
Bonnie in itself is okay, but my argument is that the existing FREE benchmarks
don't really measure the effects of system loading very well.

John