From owner-cvs-all  Mon Sep  3  1: 9:23 2001
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from ringworld.nanolink.com (discworld.nanolink.com [217.75.135.248])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F013437B403
	for <cvs-all@FreeBSD.org>; Mon,  3 Sep 2001 01:09:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 84454 invoked by uid 1000); 3 Sep 2001 08:06:28 -0000
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 11:06:28 +0300
From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>
To: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org,
	freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/mutt-devel Makefile pkg-plist
Message-ID: <20010903110628.G72833@ringworld.oblivion.bg>
Mail-Followup-To: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@FreeBSD.org>,
	cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org,
	freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
References: <200109030549.f835nDa75558@freefall.freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <200109030549.f835nDa75558@freefall.freebsd.org>; from dwcjr@FreeBSD.org on Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 10:49:13PM -0700
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <cvs-all.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20cvs-all>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20cvs-all>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 10:49:13PM -0700, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
> dwcjr       2001/09/02 22:49:13 PDT
> 
>   Modified files:
>     mail/mutt-devel      Makefile pkg-plist 
>   Log:
>   Update PORTDOC compliance
>   
>   Submitted by:	maintainer

Aside from the use of %%PORTDOCS%% mentioned by others, I think that
both this and rev. 1.126 should have bumped PORTREVISION.

IIRC, the rule for bumping PORTREVISION is that any change which
modifies the package should be indicated as such.  The previous
commit would have modified a package built with a different LOCALBASE,
and this commit would have modified a package built with NOPORTDOCS
(e.g. a custom release build).

Or am I going too far? :)

G'luck,
Peter

-- 
This sentence contradicts itself - or rather - well, no, actually it doesn't!

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message