Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 17:33:57 -0700 From: Yuri <yuri@freebsd.org> To: Daniel Engberg <diizzy@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org, Thierry <thierry@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: git: b095fb085850 - main - security/amavisd-new: Use USE_GITLAB Message-ID: <5c567eb4-0b63-faac-0a93-160c2aedd1f3@tsoft.com> In-Reply-To: <db23cadde78a444d7a88e603e0d79235@FreeBSD.org> References: <202210302006.29UK6a96011531@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <47d5123e-f2a0-be5b-020f-4f4c28e1d1c5@tsoft.com> <Y17m/PxGAuyiXs7M@graf.pompo.net> <ed51e521-2684-4cdd-63e7-c26887321864@tsoft.com> <db23cadde78a444d7a88e603e0d79235@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/30/22 16:51, Daniel Engberg wrote: > It's in the works and we preferably want to align the very few ports > left that doesn't already use USE_GITLAB for consistency > and upcoming exp-run. I've shared more details in PR 267104 about it. Why are you making changes proactively for potential future improvements? Doesn't it make more sense to make such changes after these improvements are implemented, so that there is no loss of functionality in the meantime? Future improvements can take a very long time to land, and loss of functionality is immediate. Yuri
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5c567eb4-0b63-faac-0a93-160c2aedd1f3>