From owner-freebsd-advocacy Mon Jun 15 08:16:38 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA26210 for freebsd-advocacy-outgoing; Mon, 15 Jun 1998 08:16:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA26164 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 1998 08:16:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA00900; Mon, 15 Jun 1998 08:16:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: phil grainger cc: advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: the state of bsd In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 15 Jun 1998 23:11:23 +1000." <199806151309.XAA14686@m1.gdr.net.au> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 1998 08:16:00 -0700 Message-ID: <896.897923760@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is hardly "the state of BSD", this is InfoMagic dumping a bunch of old product since they've decided to get out of the business of doing the "BSDisc" series, probably as much because of Walnut Creek CDROM's competition as the fact that the guy who was doing these for them sort of ran out of steam. I also have to say, pretty much everything I've ever seen you post to this list falls more under the category of "slamming" FreeBSD than advocating it. What kind of not-so-hidden agenda have you got here, Phil? Perhaps you'd do us all a bigger favor by simply switching to an OS you're actually capable of advocating, since nothing I've seen from you would indicate that BSD falls into that category. Does the term "troll" mean anything to you? - Jordan > http://www.InfoMagic.COM/discount1.htm > see for yourself > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message