From owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org  Sat Jul 22 13:24:51 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D954ED9AB91
 for <freebsd-security@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sat, 22 Jul 2017 13:24:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@obluda.cz)
Received: from smtp1.ms.mff.cuni.cz (smtp1.ms.mff.cuni.cz
 [IPv6:2001:718:1e03:801::4])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D5167E52F
 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 13:24:51 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from dan@obluda.cz)
X-SubmittedBy: id 100000045929 subject
 /DC=org/DC=terena/DC=tcs/C=CZ/O=Charles+20University/CN=Dan+20Lukes+20100000045929
 issued by
 /C=NL/ST=Noord-Holland/L=Amsterdam/O=TERENA/CN=TERENA+20eScience+20Personal+20CA+203
 auth type TLS.MFF
Received: from [10.20.12.2] ([194.108.204.138]) (authenticated)
 by smtp1.ms.mff.cuni.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id v6MDOlHm035694
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)
 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Sat, 22 Jul 2017 15:24:48 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from dan@obluda.cz)
Subject: Re: OpenSCAP for FreeBSD
To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
References: <3056b3dc-82d6-0634-0f14-2a4308488a95@fizk.net>
 <72d3444e-5174-776e-049e-8b3099fab779@fizk.net>
 <20170722124712.oxl6yalmhdetbwfe@mutt-hbsd>
 <1728515.Ju1NQlN6ld@freechin.atlnet>
From: Dan Lukes <dan@obluda.cz>
Message-ID: <5c3d0376-d9ca-df3f-c35b-b56e2952e87c@obluda.cz>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2017 15:24:47 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:51.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/51.0 SeaMonkey/2.48
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1728515.Ju1NQlN6ld@freechin.atlnet>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]"
 <freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-security>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2017 13:24:51 -0000

On 22.7.2017 15:17, Joey Kelly wrote:
> Maybe I'm showing my ignorance, but since it's a Linux app to begin with,  would it be therefore easier to get it to run under Linux

It's not matter of ignorance, but lack of paranoia.

If I wish to test security of particular system, I wish not to make it 
less secure by installing complex emulation subsystem of any kind.

Just my $0.02

Dan