From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 19 13:40:06 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B09137B401 for ; Sat, 19 Apr 2003 13:40:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.parodius.com (mail.parodius.com [64.71.184.173]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBB1443FB1 for ; Sat, 19 Apr 2003 13:40:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdc@pentarou.parodius.com) Received: from pentarou.parodius.com (jdc@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.parodius.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3JKdHjU046348 for ; Sat, 19 Apr 2003 13:39:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdc@pentarou.parodius.com) Received: (from jdc@localhost) by pentarou.parodius.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h3JKdHE3046347 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Sat, 19 Apr 2003 13:39:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 13:39:17 -0700 From: Jeremy Chadwick To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030419203917.GA46312@parodius.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Subject: Fwd: Re: BIND-8/9 interface bug? Or is it FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 20:40:06 -0000 A bit hasty -- I didn't realise Len's comment was sent to me personally. -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc@parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. | ----- Forwarded message from Len Conrad ----- > Received: from mgw1.MEIway.com (mgw1.meiway.com [212.73.210.75]) > by mail.parodius.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3JGH3jU036342 > for ; Sat, 19 Apr 2003 09:17:05 -0700 (PDT) > (envelope-from LConrad@Go2France.com) > Received: from VirusGate.MEIway.com (virus-gate.meiway.com [212.73.210.91]) > by mgw1.MEIway.com (Postfix Relay Hub) with ESMTP id 2BA4FEF42D > for ; Sat, 19 Apr 2003 18:14:51 +0200 (CEST) > Received: from localhost (localhost.meiway.com [127.0.0.1]) > by VirusGate.MEIway.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 348F65D009 > for ; Sat, 19 Apr 2003 18:18:19 +0200 (CEST) > Received: from mail.Go2France.com (ms1.meiway.com [212.73.210.73]) > by VirusGate.MEIway.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80EF85D008 > for ; Sat, 19 Apr 2003 18:18:18 +0200 (CEST) > Received: from tx0-go2france-c.Go2France.com [24.242.169.51] by mail.Go2France.com with ESMTP > (SMTPD32-6.06) id AB7AA86900A8; Sat, 19 Apr 2003 18:38:18 +0200 > Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.0.20030419111509.0270d818@mail.go2france.com> > X-Sender: LConrad@Go2France.com@mail.go2france.com > X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 > Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 11:17:38 -0500 > To: Jeremy Chadwick > From: Len Conrad > Subject: Re: BIND-8/9 interface bug? Or is it FreeBSD? > In-Reply-To: <20030418234119.GA85777@parodius.com> > References: <1050703016.604363.667.nullmailer@cicuta.babolo.ru> > <20030418201645.GA77986@parodius.com> > <1050703016.604363.667.nullmailer@cicuta.babolo.ru> > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed > Status: RO > X-Status: A > Content-Length: 410 > Lines: 12 > > > > Under what circumstances would the primary request data from > > the secondary on it's _public_ IP? > > NOTIFY "queries" from master to slave go to the IP of zone NS records > > Len > > > _____________________________________________________________________ > http://MenAndMice.com/DNS-training: San Jose; Denver; New York; Seattle > IMGate.MEIway.com: anti-spam gateway, effective on 1000's of sites, free > ----- End forwarded message -----