From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 4 13:49:29 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A62A1065679 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:49:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@tao.org.uk) Received: from alpha.tao.org.uk (alpha.tao.org.uk [212.42.1.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 195108FC15 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:49:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (alpha.tao.org.uk [212.42.1.232]) by alpha.tao.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B981076C93; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:49:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from alpha.tao.org.uk ([212.42.1.232]) by localhost (mail.tao.org.uk [212.42.1.232]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with LMTP id 77103-07; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:49:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [90.155.77.76] (unknown [90.155.77.76]) (Authenticated sender: joemail@alpha.tao.org.uk) by alpha.tao.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DB0D91076C78; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:49:16 +0000 (GMT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Dr Josef Karthauser In-Reply-To: <20110304131849.GA26774@icarus.home.lan> Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 13:49:15 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <0A0632A0-24C3-4B11-8542-37A58DCA6390@tao.org.uk> References: <0E00DAFC-C39F-47DC-B9AF-16419C20997F@tao.org.uk> <615F1346-E830-42E2-B229-4181B8BC56BD@exonetric.com> <53FA69D2-2EF0-4CBF-985B-6E710F15FE02@tao.org.uk> <20110302001650.GB49147@icarus.home.lan> <27423168-85BE-41B1-8E14-94F01310EFE4@tao.org.uk> <20110302121612.GA61020@icarus.home.lan> <9EAE56CB-0CE9-4A08-B783-3EF9B1059E62@tao.org.uk> <20110304131849.GA26774@icarus.home.lan> To: Jeremy Chadwick X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.2a Cc: Tom Evans , freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS on a single disk? X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 13:49:29 -0000 On 4 Mar 2011, at 13:18, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > > Not to mention, as I understand it, PAE induces all *sorts* of driver > incompatibilities and technical hurdles when it comes to the kernel. I > believe there are features/drivers/etc. which also do not build/work if > PAE is used in the kernel. If something suddenly starts acting "oddly" > on a PAE system, it wouldn't surprise me if PAE was to blame. > > Joe should be aware that amd64 does offer i386 compatibility libraries > (referred to as "lib32") so you definitely can run i386 binaries on > amd64. Hey Jeremy, I don't believe that that's an issue anymore. The XEN kernel comes configured with PAE as a default option, and I've seen elsewhere that there is no technical problems running ZFS in a PAE environment. (The PAE docs are out of date when they say we can't use kernel modules, and any 64 bit aware kernel model should run with PAE with no difficulties). Joe