From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 18 16:02:48 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA04732 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 18 Jan 1999 16:02:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from wopr.caltech.edu (wopr.caltech.edu [131.215.240.222]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA04724 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 1999 16:02:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mph@wopr.caltech.edu) Received: (from mph@localhost) by wopr.caltech.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id QAA23410; Mon, 18 Jan 1999 16:02:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mph) Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 16:02:33 -0800 From: Matthew Hunt To: jack Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SurfChina.com - Search Engine for China Message-ID: <19990118160233.A23252@wopr.caltech.edu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i In-Reply-To: ; from jack on Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 06:20:19PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 06:20:19PM -0500, jack wrote: > > -questions should be open post, but the majority of the other lists would > > do well to close doors to subscribers only. > > s/the majority of// No, that is a bad substitution. freebsd-ports needs to accept ports-related suggestions, bug reports, etc. from any interested party. Similarly for -www, -committers, and -doc at least. And, for the millionth time, unless you handle things very cleverly, closing posting to subscribers only is going to annoy a lot of people who submit messages from various addresses. -- Matthew Hunt * Stay close to the Vorlon. http://www.pobox.com/~mph/pgp.key for PGP public key 0x67203349. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message