From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Jun 27 16:44:33 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from zippy.osd.bsdi.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E48737C00D for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2000 16:44:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.osd.bsdi.com) Received: from localhost (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.osd.bsdi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA10454; Tue, 27 Jun 2000 16:44:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.osd.bsdi.com) To: Warner Losh Cc: Wes Peters , Nate Williams , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bringing LPRng into FreeBSD? In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 27 Jun 2000 17:29:19 MDT." <200006272329.RAA50325@harmony.village.org> Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 16:44:47 -0700 Message-ID: <10451.962149487@localhost> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Well, I've certainly seen more "I'm against it!" cries than I've seen "I'm for it!", leading me towards thinking that maybe it's Just Not Worth It and the standard lpr is just fine and can be augmented by apsfilter for those who want more out of it. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message