From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue May 5 13:17:09 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDF9E2E65E4 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 13:17:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mout.kundenserver.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49GgHT0k5gz3yr6 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 13:17:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de ([94.222.9.16]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue010 [212.227.15.167]) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 1MAOeB-1jPbX0034d-00BtNA; Tue, 05 May 2020 15:17:05 +0200 Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 15:17:04 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Nikita Stepanov Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which ufs Is faster: ufs1 or ufs2? Message-Id: <20200505151704.4d876046.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4603761588683677@sas1-ffdbcd5f1d77.qloud-c.yandex.net> References: <4603761588683677@sas1-ffdbcd5f1d77.qloud-c.yandex.net> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:cZ+GHj3shLIYp2+00o+5Ha6wGln6YbmYa2xYBV//ymxBcE/QfTo cOJvmSxP5lE+gHS5iRty9dG5zI2huV+3lg9r2giZ8hymqATaieq8cmPbwizsCNdenNcPgTz gxwv4d0IYb2c8uORMhJPlMAyurbOoux688vJeg7UX9ZcvoCJAFOIGnyU/3v16pkI9U4zUwe j7xYvtyGk4M8c7/hkwI9A== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:HcnPWlI7uto=:OakMg58h4a1fsfLhwf8wyG Y/Hru2WJMP/29x1sHbnDjeq11bdIsYjW731VyTAbiVLRCT47bmrDxQiUBMD3XOUBUNHLvBPS0 RO/LgJN5APgTe5rzCGShSiYUwlT8LLbnPX4NX71MmAheJCQDu9tMrpMEMy0c68D+PIpputNaO Snl0kv8y+3SsCZ/qPX/1jmiFdknLNQYCKkWWBMBb73Z/LmzIZLcwkkkV25zocT1dqmitx6xKQ kSK4uMCOYr3OV0LVxb+2fTxIHqKEYGC+2jArmpP1TT5qATnSflb1E6z5t+jZBMF6sk3m+eyIS mciG2apRhP8eQW1o5NW+D8DvzvPJdmj6wC72zsR9GJ+2bff8PVLd9xMGFy7fB7gz5oPfrdN8c Lw/92LBwZNHNaHZ0x/QUFfNi5lXFy1FyCDafftc+DELdccKF4mmPhtZYWZ/Vwr3U7QeARdlcd IjSRryGYmqQsDTIyrF0DEXBLIXtA6FNC8GPa8qneCWC1rGwEUbln0zEkfwIwTWlUAuXPOPCCc 8AWoKmLax8Bl2EjSuTtG0bfS8JLlve8QMP97P6wIu/lN77Y9R8+k05JjDt7L6kHK2Eil8Afi8 V/QBD5VVnKo8KaOagvzxWW1ZPQT228PItCMWI+qS3Vnz9oUBg5IeC1y6ULKqVcTu/QIOcCAH2 pW81IplZ/R/YKxcfMx4QLF1vSWORNL2ga1eL2qVizbjyTjt4K96jKOzmbm4TSw8edi5fCl4uf iWYBLJwPnpi86mwdga8kgqApVqQ49smdNW4IhNZJJx38eY801655czbtf1KzqL9RoWVLKANpR mLX3KafHm6+O1t23d//+Q8Q6W3nMpB5keZTEOsKFcJOt5FvRCRUf0tHjYoXBYpFf15Bs2lv X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49GgHT0k5gz3yr6 X-Spamd-Bar: +++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@edvax.de has no SPF policy when checking 212.227.126.134) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@edvax.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [5.81 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd@edvax.de]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.46)[ip: (1.48), ipnet: 212.227.0.0/16(-1.20), asn: 8560(2.04), country: DE(-0.02)]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:212.227.0.0/16, country:DE]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[edvax.de]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.95)[0.948,0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000,0]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[134.126.227.212.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_VERYGOOD(0.00)[134.126.227.212.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.19]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 13:17:10 -0000 On Tue, 05 May 2020 19:01:17 +0600, Nikita Stepanov wrote: > [again nothing] UFS1 has been used for the root partition historically (older FreeBSD versions), while UFS2 was used for everything else. Today you will probably definitely go for UFS2. It's not really about some speed advantage, but about reliability. UFS2, if set up properly, can perform quite well even under heavy I/O load. The filesystem parameters that you can set using tunefs to reflect what will be important in usage: will it be many small files, will it be huge files, will it be for a hard disk or a SSD? Additional features such as soft updates and journaling, which can help in increasing filesystem performance, are available for UFS2, not for UFS1, if I remember correctly. See "man tunefs" for details. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...