From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb  7 17:38:06 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9169216A4C9
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Wed,  7 Feb 2007 17:38:06 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from relay-er5.mbrd.ru (relay-mn.mbrd.ru [195.128.66.4])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 218B113C4AA
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Wed,  7 Feb 2007 17:38:06 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from msd.mbrd.ru ([172.16.33.193])
	by relay-er5.mbrd.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.x)
	id 1HDzRW-0008tM-0R; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 11:43:18 +0300
Message-ID: <45C6EE26.9010909@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 11:43:18 +0300
From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Randy Pratt <bsd-unix@earthlink.net>
References: <20070205001114.b4f77f86.bsd-unix@earthlink.net>
In-Reply-To: <20070205001114.b4f77f86.bsd-unix@earthlink.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Portupgrade omitting dependencies?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 17:38:06 -0000

Randy Pratt wrote:
> There seems to be some problem in the way that portupgrade handles
> dependencies in updating a port to a new version.  In quite a few
> cases, portupgrade does not restore all dependencies that were
> originally listed in the +REQUIRED_BY file.  I'll use the "netpbm"

Well, I have an idea about this I should check.

-- 
Dixi.
Sem.