From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Jan 6 3:31: 8 2001 From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 6 03:31:07 2001 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mgw1.MEIway.com (mgw1.meiway.com [212.73.210.75]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F00037B400 for ; Sat, 6 Jan 2001 03:31:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from sv.Go2France.com (sv.meiway.com [212.73.210.79]) by mgw1.MEIway.com (Postfix Relay Hub) with ESMTP id 0C4BB6A90A for ; Sat, 6 Jan 2001 12:31:06 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.0.20010106122540.050d2150@mail.Go2France.com> X-Sender: lconrad%Go2France.com@mail.Go2France.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2001 12:28:52 +0100 To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org From: Len Conrad Subject: encrypt h/w for FreeBSD? re-post Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ( sorry to re-post but I didn't get my first post back in the normally extremely short echo times I experience with FreeBSD lists, and no other msgs from hackers since I posted, as if the list was down) Sorry, got no answer in -questions. Just my quarterly check to see whether there's support coming up for hardware assisted IPsec, SSL, whatever? In addition to SSL on web servers, we'd recently have found some need like to run TLS for SMTP and postfix. The mail volumes will benefit from hardware crypto. I really prefer to stay with Free, vs. Open. Thanks, Len http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com : Binary for ISC BIND 8.2.3 T9B for NT4 & W2K http://IMGate.MEIway.com : Build free, hi-perf, anti-spam mail gateways To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message