From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 31 04:21:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apache@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2979716A41F; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 04:21:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bfoz@bfoz.net) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8014343D4C; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 04:21:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bfoz@bfoz.net) Received: from [192.168.0.5] (c-24-6-134-233.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[24.6.134.233]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2005103104025301200dsr4ve>; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 04:03:02 +0000 Message-ID: <4365975F.40905@bfoz.net> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 20:02:39 -0800 From: Brandon Fosdick User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051007) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Querna References: <436442E5.4090508@bfoz.net> <20051030210955.GB49025@goofy.cultdeadsheep.org> <4365929F.1050303@bfoz.net> <43659453.5090102@force-elite.com> In-Reply-To: <43659453.5090102@force-elite.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Clement Laforet , apache@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: www/apache21 update? X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 04:21:56 -0000 Paul Querna wrote: > Unfortunately, FreeBSD still uses the Bundled APR/APR-Util for apache. > It really needs to depend on an external APR/APR-Util port, and then it > can share it properly with things like Subversion. Most other packaging > systems have gone down this path... The new Makefile has a switch called WITH_APR_FROM_PORTS. I'm guessing that makes use of the external port. If I hadn't already installed it I would see what it does...maybe next time. Of course, you have to know to look for that option. It would be more visible if the port made use of the options framework that I'm seeing in some of the other ports (does that functionality have a name?), but I wonder how many people would know or care either way. Thanks